date:2005-03-16T04:00:00
source:Embassy Wellington
origin:05WELLINGTON222
destination:This record is a partial extract of the original cable.
The full text of the original cable is not available.

C O N F I D E N T I A L WELLINGTON 000222
SIPDIS

STATE FOR DRL, WHA/CCA, DRL/MLA, IO/SHA, AND EAP/ANZ

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/16/2015
TAGS: PHUM, CU, PREL, NZ, CHR-1, UNHRC-1
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND ON CHR AND THE CHR RESOLUTION ON CUBA

REF: A. SECSTATE 42847

B. SECSTATE 44494

Classified By: Political-Economic Counselor Katherine Hadda,
for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D).

1. (C) Acting Political-Economic Counselor provided Refs A
and B demarches concerning the 61st Session of the UN
Commission of Human Rights (CHR) and the importance of the
U.S.-sponsored CHR Cuba resolution to Val Meyer, Deputy
Director of the Human Rights Division, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs and Trade (MFAT). Meyer promised to discuss with
Embassy officers New Zealand's position on all the CHR issues
once her Ministry had had a chance to review our positions.

2. (C) On March 16, Pol-Econ Counselor followed up with
Meyer and in particular stressed our desire that New Zealand
co-sponsor the Cuba resolution. Meyer said that a memo with
recommendations for all CHR issues was being sent up to
Foreign Minister Phil Goff for his approval. While MFAT
staff hoped for fast action on the memo, Meyer suspected the
Minister would not approve it before the weekend as his
schedule is very busy.

3. (C) Pol-Econ Counselor told Meyer that the United States
hopes that New Zealand will co-sponsor the country-specific
resolutions highlighted in reftels, and in particular the
Cuba resolution. She pointed out that New Zealand officials
have in the past told us that they regret attempts by other
countries to water down human rights resolution language.
For similar reasons, our proposed resolution on Cuba has been
crafted to avoid tussles over language and to instead draw
attention to the CHR's repeated resolutions on Cuba and to
invite the CHR itself to report on its findings regarding
Cuba. Pol-Econ Counselor told Myer that despite the long
string of resolutions, human rights conditions in Cuba have
slipped back over time, not improved. Meyer suggested that,
once Minister Goff's decision has been made, Pol-Econ
Counselor meet with her and MFAT's Cuba specialists to
discuss our views on Cuba.

4. (C) Comment: Based on Meyer's comments and New Zealand's
positions on similar requests, we do not anticipate New
Zealand will agree to co-sponsor the resolution on Cuba. Nor
is it likely that New Zealand will co-sponsor the resolution
on Belarus or Burma. In the past, New Zealand officials have
disappointingly only chosen to co-sponsor human rights
resolutions concerning countries with which New Zealand has
diplomatic ties, on the grounds that New Zealand's influence
will be greatest there. The only exceptions have been cases
such as Sudan, in which New Zealand perceives that there is
widespread international agreement that violations are
particularly egregious.
Burnett