ID:109666
    Date:2007-05-24 16:30:00
    Origin:07MADRID1000
    Source:Embassy Madrid
    Classification:UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
    Dunno:07MADRID800 07MADRID899 07MADRID910
    Destination:VZCZCXRO5789
PP RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV
DE RUEHMD #1000 1441630
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 241630Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY MADRID
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2607
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD PRIORITY 0170
RUEHLA/AMCONSUL BARCELONA PRIORITY 2740
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCNFB/FBI WASHDC PRIORITY
    UNCLAS MADRID 001000 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
EUR/WE FOR ALLEGRONE, CLEMENTS AND CERVETTI 
L/LEI FOR PROPP, KULISH, AND JOHNSON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL, PGOV, MARR, SP 
SUBJECT: SPAIN/COUSO CASE: JUDGE REJECTS CHIEF PROSECUTOR'S 
APPEAL; CASE MOVES ON TO APPEALS TRIBUNAL 
 
REF: A. MADRID 910 
     B. MADRID 899 
     C. MADRID 800 AND OTHERS 
 
1. (SBU)
On May 24 Spanish investigative magistrate Judge 
Santiago Pedraz rejected the appeal of National Court Chief 
Prosecutor Javier Zaragoza to drop the charges against three 
U.S. servicemen accused of killing Spanish television 
cameraman Jose Couso during a firefight in Baghdad in April 
2003.  Despite the rejection by Judge Pedraz, this case will 
proceed to the National Court appeals tribunal, which will 
rule on the merits of the arguments put forth by Pedraz and 
by the National Court prosecutors.  As we reported in REFTEL 
A, Zaragoza contacted us on May 14 to report that he had 
appealed the Pedraz decision to file formal charges against 
the three servicemen, saying that his technical and legal 
review of the facts led him to conclude that the killing of 
Couso was not intentional, and therefore the soldiers could 
not be charged with war crimes or murder.  In today's ruling 
Judge Pedraz claimed to be surprised by Zaragoza's appeal, as 
the National Prosecutors Office did not oppose his initial 
ruling to reactivate arrest warrants for the servicemen and 
therefore tacitly agreed with the case. 
 
2. (SBU)
Comment.  Today's ruling by Pedraz was not a 
surprise as judges do not normally change their original 
ruling after an appeal based on the technical or legal review 
of the National Court Prosecutors Office.  This case, as we 
expected, will now be forwarded to the Criminal Division of 
the National Court.  Post will continue to report on this 
case as it develops. 

LLORENS